[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-17852?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Stamatis Zampetakis updated HIVE-17852:
---------------------------------------
    Fix Version/s:     (was: 4.0.0)

I cleared the fixVersion field since this ticket is not resolved. Please review 
this ticket and if the fix is already committed to a specific version please 
set the version accordingly and mark the ticket as RESOLVED.

According to the JIRA guidelines 
(https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/Hive/HowToContribute) the 
fixVersion should be set only when the issue is resolved/closed.

> remove support for list bucketing "stored as directories" in 3.0
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HIVE-17852
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-17852
>             Project: Hive
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Sergey Shelukhin
>            Assignee: László Bodor
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: HIVE-17852.01.patch, HIVE-17852.02.patch, 
> HIVE-17852.03.patch, HIVE-17852.04.patch, HIVE-17852.05.patch, 
> HIVE-17852.06.patch, HIVE-17852.07.patch, HIVE-17852.08.patch, 
> HIVE-17852.09.patch, HIVE-17852.10.patch, HIVE-17852.11.patch, 
> HIVE-17852.12.patch, HIVE-17852.13.patch, HIVE-17852.14.patch, 
> HIVE-17852.15.patch, HIVE-17852.16.patch, HIVE-17852.17.patch, 
> HIVE-17852.18.patch, HIVE-17852.19.patch, HIVE-17852.20.patch, 
> HIVE-17852.21.patch
>
>
> From the email thread:
> 1) LB, when stored as directories, adds a lot of low-level complexity to Hive 
> tables that has to be accounted for in many places in the code where the 
> files are written or modified - from FSOP to ACID/replication/export.
> 2) While working on some FSOP code I noticed that some of that logic is 
> broken - e.g. the duplicate file removal from tasks, a pretty fundamental 
> correctness feature in Hive, may be broken. LB also doesn’t appear to be 
> compatible with e.g. regular bucketing.
> 3) The feature hasn’t seen development activity in a while; it also doesn’t 
> appear to be used a lot.
> Keeping with the theme of cleaning up “legacy” code for 3.0, I was proposing 
> we remove it.
> (2) also suggested that, if needed, it might be easier to implement similar 
> functionality by adding some flexibility to partitions (which LB directories 
> look like anyway); that would also keep the logic on a higher level of 
> abstraction (split generation, partition pruning) as opposed to many 
> low-level places like FSOP, etc.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to