[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-26320?focusedWorklogId=792388&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-792388
]
ASF GitHub Bot logged work on HIVE-26320:
-----------------------------------------
Author: ASF GitHub Bot
Created on: 18/Jul/22 23:35
Start Date: 18/Jul/22 23:35
Worklog Time Spent: 10m
Work Description: jfsii opened a new pull request, #3453:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hive/pull/3453
…ucts
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add needed CASTing in RexTransformIntoInClause when creates structs for the
IN clause conversion.
<!--
Please clarify what changes you are proposing. The purpose of this section
is to outline the changes and how this PR fixes the issue.
If possible, please consider writing useful notes for better and faster
reviews in your PR. See the examples below.
1. If you refactor some codes with changing classes, showing the class
hierarchy will help reviewers.
2. If you fix some SQL features, you can provide some references of other
DBMSes.
3. If there is design documentation, please add the link.
4. If there is a discussion in the mailing list, please add the link.
-->
### Why are the changes needed? Incorrect (or unexpected) results.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? Yes. It fixes a bug
that is user visible.
<!--
Note that it means *any* user-facing change including all aspects such as
the documentation fix.
If yes, please clarify the previous behavior and the change this PR proposes
- provide the console output, description, screenshot and/or a reproducable
example to show the behavior difference if possible.
If possible, please also clarify if this is a user-facing change compared to
the released Hive versions or within the unreleased branches such as master.
If no, write 'No'.
-->
### How was this patch tested? Through the qtest system.
<!--
If tests were added, say they were added here. Please make sure to add some
test cases that check the changes thoroughly including negative and positive
cases if possible.
If it was tested in a way different from regular unit tests, please clarify
how you tested step by step, ideally copy and paste-able, so that other
reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in the future.
If tests were not added, please describe why they were not added and/or why
it was difficult to add.
-->
Issue Time Tracking
-------------------
Worklog Id: (was: 792388)
Remaining Estimate: 0h
Time Spent: 10m
> Incorrect case evaluation for Parquet based table
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HIVE-26320
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-26320
> Project: Hive
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: HiveServer2, Query Planning
> Affects Versions: 4.0.0-alpha-1
> Reporter: Chiran Ravani
> Assignee: John Sherman
> Priority: Major
> Time Spent: 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Query involving case statement with two or more conditions leads to incorrect
> result for tables with parquet format, The problem is not observed with ORC
> or TextFile.
> *Steps to reproduce*:
> {code:java}
> create external table case_test_parquet(kob varchar(2),enhanced_type_code
> int) stored as parquet;
> insert into case_test_parquet values('BB',18),('BC',18),('AB',18);
> select case when (
> (kob='BB' and enhanced_type_code='18')
> or (kob='BC' and enhanced_type_code='18')
> )
> then 1
> else 0
> end as logic_check
> from case_test_parquet;
> {code}
> Result:
> {code}
> 0
> 0
> 0
> {code}
> Expected result:
> {code}
> 1
> 1
> 0
> {code}
> The problem does not appear when setting hive.optimize.point.lookup=false.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
