[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-26055?focusedWorklogId=773424&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-773424 ]
ASF GitHub Bot logged work on HIVE-26055: ----------------------------------------- Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created on: 23/May/22 10:59 Start Date: 23/May/22 10:59 Worklog Time Spent: 10m Work Description: kgyrtkirk commented on code in PR #3247: URL: https://github.com/apache/hive/pull/3247#discussion_r879312194 ########## ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/ddl/table/misc/rename/AbstractAlterTableRenameAnalyzer.java: ########## @@ -49,6 +55,13 @@ protected void analyzeCommand(TableName tableName, Map<String, String> partition setAcidDdlDesc(desc); } addInputsOutputsAlterTable(tableName, null, desc, desc.getType(), false); +// inputs.add(new ReadEntity(table)); + outputs.clear(); Review Comment: doing `outputs.clear()` right after `addInputsOutputsAlterTable` is pretty strange could you please put this code into that method - isn't there where it supposed to live? ########## ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/security/authorization/plugin/sqlstd/SQLAuthorizationUtils.java: ########## @@ -271,7 +271,16 @@ private static boolean isOwner(IMetaStoreClient metastoreClient, String userName thriftTableObj = metastoreClient.getTable(hivePrivObject.getDbname(), hivePrivObject.getObjectName()); } catch (Exception e) { - throwGetObjErr(e, hivePrivObject); + boolean isTableExists = true; + try { + if(!metastoreClient.tableExists(hivePrivObject.getDbname(), hivePrivObject.getObjectName())) { Review Comment: it would be better to place this check at the call site-s to this method - so that the explanation will not be needed at all ########## ql/src/test/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/lockmgr/TestDbTxnManager2.java: ########## @@ -3612,8 +3612,8 @@ private void testRenameTable(boolean blocking) throws Exception { txnMgr2.acquireLocks(driver2.getPlan(), ctx, null, false); locks = getLocks(); - ShowLocksResponseElement checkLock = checkLock(LockType.EXCLUSIVE, - LockState.WAITING, "default", "tab_acid", null, locks); + ShowLocksResponseElement checkLock = checkLock(LockType.SHARED_READ, Review Comment: Why we don't need an exclusive lock during a rename? * what if we are reading data from a table in some dag * in the meantime someone renames the table with `SHARED_READ` the table will be renamed instantly - which will cause the dag to fail; or not? Issue Time Tracking ------------------- Worklog Id: (was: 773424) Time Spent: 40m (was: 0.5h) > Fix the HivePrivilegesObjects for Alter table rename command > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HIVE-26055 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-26055 > Project: Hive > Issue Type: Bug > Components: HiveServer2, Security > Reporter: Sai Hemanth Gantasala > Assignee: Sai Hemanth Gantasala > Priority: Major > Labels: pull-request-available > Time Spent: 40m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > Fix the HivePrivilegeObjects for Alter table rename query in a way that it > includes source table information in the output objects and destination table > information in the input objects. > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.7#820007)