[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-24357?focusedWorklogId=511223&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-511223
]
ASF GitHub Bot logged work on HIVE-24357:
-----------------------------------------
Author: ASF GitHub Bot
Created on: 13/Nov/20 06:39
Start Date: 13/Nov/20 06:39
Worklog Time Spent: 10m
Work Description: jcamachor commented on a change in pull request #1653:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hive/pull/1653#discussion_r522678529
##########
File path: ql/src/test/results/clientpositive/perf/tez/query61.q.out
##########
@@ -165,70 +167,81 @@ Stage-0
SHUFFLE [RS_38]
PartitionCols:_col2
Merge Join Operator [MERGEJOIN_256] (rows=2526982
width=0)
-
Conds:RS_30._col4=RS_290._col0(Inner),Output:["_col2","_col5"]
- <-Map 20 [SIMPLE_EDGE] vectorized
- SHUFFLE [RS_290]
+
Conds:RS_30._col4=RS_295._col0(Inner),Output:["_col2","_col5"]
+ <-Map 21 [SIMPLE_EDGE] vectorized
+ SHUFFLE [RS_295]
PartitionCols:_col0
- Select Operator [SEL_289] (rows=2300 width=4)
+ Select Operator [SEL_294] (rows=2300 width=4)
Output:["_col0"]
- Filter Operator [FIL_288] (rows=2300 width=259)
+ Filter Operator [FIL_293] (rows=2300 width=259)
predicate:(((p_channel_dmail = 'Y') or
(p_channel_email = 'Y') or (p_channel_tv = 'Y')) and p_promo_sk is not null)
TableScan [TS_18] (rows=2300 width=259)
default@promotion,promotion,Tbl:COMPLETE,Col:COMPLETE,Output:["p_promo_sk","p_channel_dmail","p_channel_email","p_channel_tv"]
<-Reducer 12 [SIMPLE_EDGE]
SHUFFLE [RS_30]
PartitionCols:_col4
Merge Join Operator [MERGEJOIN_255] (rows=2526982
width=0)
-
Conds:RS_27._col3=RS_286._col0(Inner),Output:["_col2","_col4","_col5"]
- <-Map 19 [SIMPLE_EDGE] vectorized
- SHUFFLE [RS_286]
+
Conds:RS_27._col3=RS_291._col0(Inner),Output:["_col2","_col4","_col5"]
+ <-Map 20 [SIMPLE_EDGE] vectorized
+ SHUFFLE [RS_291]
PartitionCols:_col0
- Select Operator [SEL_285] (rows=341 width=4)
+ Select Operator [SEL_290] (rows=341 width=4)
Output:["_col0"]
- Filter Operator [FIL_284] (rows=341
width=115)
+ Filter Operator [FIL_289] (rows=341
width=115)
predicate:((s_gmt_offset = -7) and
s_store_sk is not null)
TableScan [TS_15] (rows=1704 width=115)
default@store,store,Tbl:COMPLETE,Col:COMPLETE,Output:["s_store_sk","s_gmt_offset"]
<-Reducer 11 [SIMPLE_EDGE]
SHUFFLE [RS_27]
PartitionCols:_col3
Merge Join Operator [MERGEJOIN_254]
(rows=12627499 width=0)
-
Conds:RS_24._col1=RS_282._col0(Inner),Output:["_col2","_col3","_col4","_col5"]
- <-Map 18 [SIMPLE_EDGE] vectorized
- SHUFFLE [RS_282]
+
Conds:RS_24._col1=RS_287._col0(Inner),Output:["_col2","_col3","_col4","_col5"]
+ <-Map 19 [SIMPLE_EDGE] vectorized
+ SHUFFLE [RS_287]
PartitionCols:_col0
- Select Operator [SEL_281] (rows=46200
width=4)
+ Select Operator [SEL_286] (rows=46200
width=4)
Output:["_col0"]
- Filter Operator [FIL_280] (rows=46200
width=94)
+ Filter Operator [FIL_285] (rows=46200
width=94)
predicate:((i_category =
'Electronics') and i_item_sk is not null)
TableScan [TS_12] (rows=462000
width=94)
default@item,item,Tbl:COMPLETE,Col:COMPLETE,Output:["i_item_sk","i_category"]
<-Reducer 10 [SIMPLE_EDGE]
SHUFFLE [RS_24]
PartitionCols:_col1
Merge Join Operator [MERGEJOIN_253]
(rows=13119234 width=4)
-
Conds:RS_274._col0=RS_278._col0(Inner),Output:["_col1","_col2","_col3","_col4","_col5"]
+
Conds:RS_283._col0=RS_272._col0(Inner),Output:["_col1","_col2","_col3","_col4","_col5"]
<-Map 17 [SIMPLE_EDGE] vectorized
- SHUFFLE [RS_278]
+ PARTITION_ONLY_SHUFFLE [RS_272]
PartitionCols:_col0
- Select Operator [SEL_277] (rows=50
width=4)
+ Select Operator [SEL_271] (rows=50
width=4)
Output:["_col0"]
- Filter Operator [FIL_276] (rows=50
width=12)
+ Filter Operator [FIL_270] (rows=50
width=12)
predicate:((d_year = 1999) and
(d_moy = 11) and d_date_sk is not null)
TableScan [TS_9] (rows=73049
width=12)
default@date_dim,date_dim,Tbl:COMPLETE,Col:COMPLETE,Output:["d_date_sk","d_year","d_moy"]
<-Map 9 [SIMPLE_EDGE] vectorized
- SHUFFLE [RS_274]
+ SHUFFLE [RS_283]
PartitionCols:_col0
- Select Operator [SEL_272]
(rows=479120969 width=126)
+ Select Operator [SEL_281]
(rows=479120969 width=126)
Output:["_col0","_col1","_col2","_col3","_col4","_col5"]
- Filter Operator [FIL_270]
(rows=479120969 width=126)
- predicate:(ss_sold_date_sk is not
null and ss_promo_sk is not null and ss_customer_sk is not null and ss_store_sk
is not null and ss_item_sk is not null)
+ Filter Operator [FIL_279]
(rows=479120969 width=126)
+ predicate:(ss_sold_date_sk is not
null and ss_promo_sk is not null and ss_customer_sk is not null and ss_store_sk
is not null and ss_item_sk is not null and ss_sold_date_sk BETWEEN
DynamicValue(RS_22_date_dim_d_date_sk_min) AND
DynamicValue(RS_22_date_dim_d_date_sk_max) and in_bloom_filter(ss_sold_date_sk,
DynamicValue(RS_22_date_dim_d_date_sk_bloom_filter)) and ((ss_sold_date_sk is
not null and ss_promo_sk is not null and ss_customer_sk is not null and
ss_store_sk is not null and ss_item_sk is not null) or (ss_sold_date_sk is not
null and ss_customer_sk is not null and ss_store_sk is not null and ss_item_sk
is not null)))
TableScan [TS_6] (rows=575995635
width=126)
default@store_sales,store_sales,Tbl:COMPLETE,Col:COMPLETE,Output:["ss_sold_date_sk","ss_item_sk","ss_customer_sk","ss_store_sk","ss_promo_sk","ss_ext_sales_price"]
+ <-Reducer 18 [BROADCAST_EDGE]
vectorized
Review comment:
Maybe it was because one TS was targeted by a SJ and the other one was
not?
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
Issue Time Tracking
-------------------
Worklog Id: (was: 511223)
Time Spent: 40m (was: 0.5h)
> Exchange SWO table/algorithm strategy
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: HIVE-24357
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-24357
> Project: Hive
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Zoltan Haindrich
> Assignee: Zoltan Haindrich
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Attachments: swo.before.jointree.dot.png
>
> Time Spent: 40m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> SWO right now runs like:
> {code}
> for every strategy s: for every table t: try s for t
> {code}
> this results in that an earlier startegy may create a more entangled operator
> tree behind - in case its able to merge for a less prioritized table
> it would probably make more sense to do:
> {code}
> for every table t: for every strategy s: try s for t
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
