[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-22988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17055568#comment-17055568
 ] 

Hive QA commented on HIVE-22988:
--------------------------------



Here are the results of testing the latest attachment:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12996199/HIVE-22988.2.patch

{color:red}ERROR:{color} -1 due to no test(s) being added or modified.

{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} +1 due to 18093 tests passed

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HIVE-Build/21044/testReport
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HIVE-Build/21044/console
Test logs: http://104.198.109.242/logs/PreCommit-HIVE-Build-21044/

Messages:
{noformat}
Executing org.apache.hive.ptest.execution.TestCheckPhase
Executing org.apache.hive.ptest.execution.PrepPhase
Executing org.apache.hive.ptest.execution.YetusPhase
Executing org.apache.hive.ptest.execution.ExecutionPhase
Executing org.apache.hive.ptest.execution.ReportingPhase
{noformat}

This message is automatically generated.

ATTACHMENT ID: 12996199 - PreCommit-HIVE-Build

> LLAP: If consistent splits is disabled ordering instances is not required
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HIVE-22988
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-22988
>             Project: Hive
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 4.0.0
>            Reporter: Prasanth Jayachandran
>            Assignee: Prasanth Jayachandran
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>         Attachments: HIVE-22988.1.patch, HIVE-22988.2.patch
>
>          Time Spent: 20m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> LlapTaskSchedulerService always gets consistent ordered list of all LLAP 
> instances even if consistent splits is disabled. When consistent split is 
> disabled ordering isn't really useful as there is no cache locality. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to