[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-20451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16592321#comment-16592321
 ] 

Alexander Kolbasov commented on HIVE-20451:
-------------------------------------------

With this patch I have the following result:

# {{standalone-metastore/target}} has the full source called {{ 
apache-hive-metastore-4.0.0-SNAPSHOT-src.tar.gz}}
# {{standalone-metastore/metastore-server/target}} has 
{{apache-hive-metastore--server-4.0.0-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.gz}} file
# {{standalone-metastpre/metastore-common/target}} has 
{{apache-hive-metastore-4.0.0-SNAPSHOT-src.tar.gz}}

I don't think we need a binary tarball for metastore-common because there is 
nothing that can be executed from there.
I tried to eliminate source tarball from metastore-common but it is still 
created because top-level now defines assembly plugin which is inherited by 
metastore-common. Is it really a problem?


> Metastore client and server tarball issues
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HIVE-20451
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-20451
>             Project: Hive
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Standalone Metastore
>    Affects Versions: 4.0.0
>            Reporter: Alan Gates
>            Assignee: Alexander Kolbasov
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: HIVE-20451.01.patch
>
>
> With the split of the metastore into common and server there are now two sets 
> of tarballs.  There are a couple of issues here.
>  # It doesn't make sense to have separate source tarballs for each.  The 
> source release should still be done from the standalone-metastore directory 
> and include all code for the metastore.
>  # The binary tarballs should have separate names.  At the moment both are 
> named apache-hive-metastore.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to