[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-19902?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16540665#comment-16540665 ]
Alexander Kolbasov commented on HIVE-19902: ------------------------------------------- [~owen.omalley] Thank you for the example - I didn't know about Level.Trial annotations. I'll experiment with JMH more using this approach. I still have other concerns with JMH since it doesn't give me full control over the results dataset. One feature that I am using a lot is saving raw data in files and looking at gnuplot graphs. [~alangates] [~pvary] [~vihangk1] [~owen.omalley] I still think that the current approach (not using JMH) has its benefits - it is very simple and doesn't have any licensing issues. What do you think about going ahead with the current proposed implementation and then later possibly adding separate JMH-based submodule which isn't compiled by default? > Provide Metastore micro-benchmarks > ---------------------------------- > > Key: HIVE-19902 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-19902 > Project: Hive > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Standalone Metastore > Affects Versions: 3.1.0, 4.0.0 > Reporter: Alexander Kolbasov > Assignee: Alexander Kolbasov > Priority: Major > Attachments: HIVE-19902.01.patch, HIVE-19902.02.patch, > HIVE-19902.03.patch, HIVE-19902.04.patch > > > It would be very useful to have metastore benchmarks to be able to track perf > issues. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)