[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-19708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16504405#comment-16504405 ]
Hive QA commented on HIVE-19708: -------------------------------- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment || | {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} patch {color} | {color:red} 0m 8s{color} | {color:red} /data/hiveptest/logs/PreCommit-HIVE-Build-11582/patches/PreCommit-HIVE-Build-11582.patch does not apply to master. Rebase required? Wrong Branch? See http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/Hive/HowToContribute for help. {color} | \\ \\ || Subsystem || Report/Notes || | Console output | http://104.198.109.242/logs//PreCommit-HIVE-Build-11582/yetus.txt | | Powered by | Apache Yetus http://yetus.apache.org | This message was automatically generated. > Repl copy retrying with cm path even if the failure is due to network issue > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HIVE-19708 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-19708 > Project: Hive > Issue Type: Task > Components: Hive, HiveServer2, repl > Affects Versions: 3.1.0 > Reporter: mahesh kumar behera > Assignee: mahesh kumar behera > Priority: Major > Labels: pull-request-available > Fix For: 4.0.0 > > Attachments: HIVE-19708.01.patch, HIVE-19708.02.patch, > HIVE-19708.04.patch, HIVE-19708.05.patch, HIVE-19708.06-branch-3.patch, > HIVE-19708.06.patch, HIVE-19708.07-branch-3.patch > > > * During repl load > ** for filesystem based copying of file if the copy fails due to a > connection error to source Name Node, we should recreate the filesystem > object. > ** the retry logic for local file copy should be triggered using the > original source file path ( and not the CM root path ) since failure can be > due to network issues between DFSClient and NN. > * When listing files in tables / partition to include them in _files, we > should add retry logic when failure occurs. FileSystem object here also > should be recreated since the existing one might be in inconsistent state. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)