[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17898487#comment-17898487
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-28268:
--------------------------------
Results for branch branch-2.6
[build #240 on
builds.a.o|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.6/240/]:
(x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}*
----
details (if available):
(/) {color:green}+1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.6/240/General_20Nightly_20Build_20Report/]
(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop2 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop2)
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.6/240/JDK8_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop2_29/]
(/) {color:green}+1 jdk8 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop3)
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.6/240/JDK8_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]
(x) {color:red}-1 jdk11 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk11
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.6/240/JDK11_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]
(/) {color:green}+1 jdk17 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk17
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.6/240/JDK17_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]
(/) {color:green}+1 jdk17 hadoop ${HADOOP_THREE_VERSION} backward compatibility
checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk17
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.6/240/JDK17_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]
(/) {color:green}+1 jdk17 hadoop ${HADOOP_THREE_VERSION} backward compatibility
checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk17
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.6/240/JDK17_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]
(/) {color:green}+1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.
(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test for HBase 2 {color}
(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test for 3.3.5 {color}
(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test for 3.3.6 {color}
(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test for 3.4.0 {color}
> Provide option to skip wal while using TableOutputFormat
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-28268
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28268
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: mapreduce
> Reporter: Ujjawal Kumar
> Assignee: Raghavendra B
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: newbie, pull-request-available
> Fix For: 2.7.0, 3.0.0-beta-2, 2.5.11, 2.6.2
>
>
> If we have replication setup between clusters A <-> B, during production
> incidents where HFiles get corrupted (e.g. via hdfs missing blocks) on
> cluster A, we can use CopyTable job to copy the data from B
> In those cases considering the data is being copied from B to A via
> CopyTable, it doesn't make sense to write to WALs on A using
> TableOutputFormat (since the mutations being copied already exist on B).
> We can add a config to customise durability
> ([https://github.com/apache/hbase/blob/master/hbase-client/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/client/Durability.java])
> within TableOutputFormat so that an operator can use it to skip WAL writes
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
