[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16160764#comment-16160764
]
stack commented on HBASE-10944:
-------------------------------
bq. Am fine with expsosing it for Cells. Add a clear comment saying avoid using
in the actual code.
To what does this refer [~ram_krish]?
bq, I just did a final search of kv.getBuffer - we have references to it in
PrefixTreeCoder and in RowIndexCodecV1.
Or just not bother w/ this holdouts? Add a comment that they need to be
converted but will do later if they become relevant again (I presume
RowIndexCodecV1 has been subsummed by V2? And prefixTreeCoder is a project that
didn't take -- though it should have.... And it presumes knowledge of KV
internals).
Can we resolve this and the parent? Is that presumptious? Or we waiting on the
MR change to complete?
Thanks lads.
> Remove all kv.getBuffer() and kv.getRow() references existing in the code
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-10944
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10944
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
> Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 1.5.0, 2.0.0-alpha-3
>
>
> kv.getRow() and kv.getBuffers() are still used in places to form key byte[]
> and row byte[]. Removing all such instances including testcases will make
> the usage of Cell complete.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
