[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16141105#comment-16141105
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-18169:
-----------------------------------
Oh, there is a coprocessor example {{ZooKeeperScanPolicyObserver}}, in which we
use the constructor of {{StoreScanner}}, which is marked as IA.Private...
How do we deal with this? Wrapping an {{InternalScanner}} can only do
filtering, should we give user the ability to change the read point, and also
the {{ScanType}}, from RETAIN_DELETE to DROP_DELETE? Anyway, I do not think we
should let user create StoreScanner directly.
> Coprocessor fix and cleanup before 2.0.0 release
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-18169
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18169
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Coprocessors
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0-alpha-1
> Reporter: Duo Zhang
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 2.0.0-alpha-3
>
>
> As discussed in HBASE-18038. In RegionServerServices, Region and StoreFile
> interfaces we expose too many unnecessary methods. We need to find a way to
> not expose these methods to CP.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
