[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16000382#comment-16000382
]
ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-17887:
------------------------------------------------
Ok. Sorry.
bq.return new MemStoreSnapshot(this.snapshotId, this.snapshot);
This snapshotId is not the cacheFlushSeqId. So what we return is fine. But
still if the snapshot is already available is it right to do another flush on
the same snapshot??
> TestAcidGuarantees fails frequently
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-17887
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17887
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: regionserver
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0
> Reporter: Umesh Agashe
> Assignee: Chia-Ping Tsai
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.4.0, 1.2.6, 1.3.2, 1.4.1
>
> Attachments: HBASE-17887.branch-1.v0.patch,
> HBASE-17887.branch-1.v1.patch, HBASE-17887.branch-1.v1.patch,
> HBASE-17887.branch-1.v2.patch, HBASE-17887.branch-1.v2.patch,
> HBASE-17887.branch-1.v3.patch, HBASE-17887.branch-1.v4.patch,
> HBASE-17887.branch-1.v4.patch, HBASE-17887.branch-1.v4.patch,
> HBASE-17887.v0.patch, HBASE-17887.v1.patch
>
>
> As per the flaky tests dashboard here:
> https://builds.apache.org/job/HBASE-Find-Flaky-Tests/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dashboard.html,
> It fails 30% of the time.
> While working on HBASE-17863, a few verification builds on patch failed due
> to TestAcidGuarantees didn't pass. IMHO, the changes for HBASE-17863 are
> unlikely to affect get/ put path.
> I ran the test with and without the patch several times locally and found
> that TestAcidGuarantees fails without the patch similar number of times.
> Opening blocker, considering acid guarantees are critical to HBase.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
