[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17958?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15994598#comment-15994598
]
Guanghao Zhang commented on HBASE-17958:
----------------------------------------
The failed UTs should be not related. I try them locally and
TestRSKilledWhenInitializing failed (run 3 times and failed 2 times). But it
may failed on branch-1, too. So I thought it may be a flaky test of branch-1.
But we don't have a flaky test dashboard for branch-1? I will reattach the
patch to trigger the hadoop QA again.
> Avoid passing unexpected cell to ScanQueryMatcher when optimize SEEK to SKIP
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-17958
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17958
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Guanghao Zhang
> Assignee: Guanghao Zhang
> Attachments: 0001-add-one-ut-testWithColumnCountGetFilter.patch,
> HBASE-17958-branch-1.patch, HBASE-17958-branch-1.patch,
> HBASE-17958-branch-1.patch, HBASE-17958-v1.patch, HBASE-17958-v2.patch,
> HBASE-17958-v3.patch, HBASE-17958-v4.patch, HBASE-17958-v5.patch,
> HBASE-17958-v6.patch, HBASE-17958-v7.patch, HBASE-17958-v7.patch
>
>
> {code}
> ScanQueryMatcher.MatchCode qcode = matcher.match(cell);
> qcode = optimize(qcode, cell);
> {code}
> The optimize method may change the MatchCode from SEEK_NEXT_COL/SEEK_NEXT_ROW
> to SKIP. But it still pass the next cell to ScanQueryMatcher. It will get
> wrong result when use some filter, etc. ColumnCountGetFilter. It just count
> the columns's number. If pass a same column to this filter, the count result
> will be wrong. So we should avoid passing cell to ScanQueryMatcher when
> optimize SEEK to SKIP.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
