[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
CHIA-PING TSAI updated HBASE-17735:
-----------------------------------
Description:
I'm employing the AsyncConnection to rewrite our application. I find that the
AsyncConnection#getTable() and Connection#getTable() have some "slight"
differences.
# Connection#getTable() throws IOException;
# AsyncConnection#getTable() requires the pool;
# AsyncTable doesn't need to be closed
It may confuse the developers if they have no time to trace the source code
(smile). Should we unify them?
Any suggestion is welcomed
was:
I'm employing the AsyncConnection to rewrite our application. I find that the
AsyncConnection#getTable() and Connection#getTable() have some "slight"
differences.
# Connection#getTable() throws IOException;
# AsyncConnection#getTable() requires the pool;
# AsyncTable doesn't need to be closed
It may confuse the developers if they have no time to trace the source code
(smile). May be we can unify them?
Any suggestion is welcomed
> The usage of getTable() is different between AsyncConnection and Connection
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-17735
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17735
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Wish
> Reporter: CHIA-PING TSAI
> Priority: Minor
>
> I'm employing the AsyncConnection to rewrite our application. I find that the
> AsyncConnection#getTable() and Connection#getTable() have some "slight"
> differences.
> # Connection#getTable() throws IOException;
> # AsyncConnection#getTable() requires the pool;
> # AsyncTable doesn't need to be closed
> It may confuse the developers if they have no time to trace the source code
> (smile). Should we unify them?
> Any suggestion is welcomed
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
