[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14331?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hiroshi Ikeda updated HBASE-14331:
----------------------------------
Attachment: CallQueuePerformanceTestApp.java
Added a simple application to check performance between {{LinkedBlockingQueue}}
and {{ConcurrentLinkedQueue}} with {{Semaphore}}. The callQueue here is not one
in HBase but is defined inside as a mere simple interface. This application
also show how many threads to read from the queue were simultaneously waken.
In my environment using {{ConcurrentLinkedQueue}} is about 1.5-2 times faster,
aside from whether the performance test practically makes sense.
> a single callQueue related improvements
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-14331
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14331
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: IPC/RPC, Performance
> Reporter: Hiroshi Ikeda
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: CallQueuePerformanceTestApp.java
>
>
> {{LinkedBlockingQueue}} well separates locks between the {{take}} method and
> the {{put}} method, but not between takers, and not between putters. These
> methods are implemented to take locks at the almost beginning of their logic.
> HBASE-11355 introduces multiple call-queues to reduce such possible
> congestion, but I doubt that it is required to stick to {{BlockingQueue}}.
> There are the other shortcomings of using {{BlockingQueue}}. When using
> multiple queues, since {{BlockingQueue}} blocks threads it is required to
> prepare enough threads for each queue. It is possible that there is a queue
> starving for threads while there is another queue where threads are idle.
> Even if you can tune parameters to avoid such situations, the tuning is not
> so trivial.
> I suggest using a single {{ConcurrentLinkedQueue}} with {{Semaphore}}.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
