[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6250?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15955200#comment-15955200
]
Stefano Bortoli commented on FLINK-6250:
----------------------------------------
I am also fine implementing it extending the existing function. Practically it
would be what would have happened, but in another file. Currently I am trying
to understand where the DISTINCT marker gets lost as it does not arrive to the
OVER aggregation function. Probably it is intercepted in early stages of the
query processing.
> Distinct procTime with Rows boundaries
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-6250
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6250
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Table API & SQL
> Reporter: radu
> Assignee: Stefano Bortoli
>
> Support proctime with rows boundaries
> Q1.1. `SELECT SUM( DISTINCT b) OVER (ORDER BY procTime() ROWS BETWEEN 2
> PRECEDING AND CURRENT ROW) FROM stream1`
> Q1.1. `SELECT COUNT(b), SUM( DISTINCT b) OVER (ORDER BY procTime() ROWS
> BETWEEN 2 PRECEDING AND CURRENT ROW) FROM stream1`
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
