[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6246?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15953558#comment-15953558
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-6246:
---------------------------------------

Github user dawidwys commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3662#discussion_r109428555
  
    --- Diff: 
flink-streaming-java/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/streaming/runtime/tasks/OperatorChain.java
 ---
    @@ -619,20 +619,20 @@ public void collect(StreamRecord<T> record) {
                }
     
                @Override
    -           public <X> void collect(OutputTag<?> outputTag, StreamRecord<X> 
record) {
    +           public <X> void collect(OutputTag<X> outputTag, StreamRecord<X> 
record) {
                        for (int i = 0; i < outputs.length - 1; i++) {
                                Output<StreamRecord<T>> output = outputs[i];
     
                                // due to side outputs, StreamRecords of 
varying types can pass through the broadcasting
                                // collector so we need to cast
                                @SuppressWarnings({"unchecked", "rawtypes"})
    --- End diff --
    
    Suppression not needed anymore. Also the comment is not adequate, as we do 
not cast anything.


> Fix generic type of OutputTag in operator Output
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-6246
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6246
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: DataStream API
>            Reporter: Aljoscha Krettek
>
> The current signature is
> {code}
> <X> void collect(OutputTag<?> outputTag, StreamRecord<X> record)
> {code}
> which can be improved to
> {code}
> <X> void collect(OutputTag<X> outputTag, StreamRecord<X> record)
> {code}
> This is probably leftover from an intermediate stage of development.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to