Github user tony810430 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3651#discussion_r108864693
--- Diff:
flink-connectors/flink-connector-kinesis/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/streaming/connectors/kinesis/util/KinesisConfigUtil.java
---
@@ -224,27 +222,19 @@ private static void
validateOptionalPositiveDoubleProperty(Properties config, St
}
}
- private static void validateOptionalDateProperty(Properties config,
String timestampKey, String formatKey, String message) {
+ private static void validateOptionalDateProperty(Properties config,
String timestampKey, String format, String message) {
if (config.containsKey(timestampKey)) {
- if (config.containsKey(formatKey)) {
- try {
- SimpleDateFormat customDateFormat = new
SimpleDateFormat(config.getProperty(formatKey));
-
customDateFormat.parse(config.getProperty(timestampKey));
- } catch (ParseException |
IllegalArgumentException | NullPointerException exception) {
- throw new
IllegalArgumentException(message);
- }
- } else {
+ try {
+ SimpleDateFormat customDateFormat = new
SimpleDateFormat(format);
+
customDateFormat.parse(config.getProperty(timestampKey));
+ } catch (ParseException | IllegalArgumentException |
NullPointerException exception) {
--- End diff --
Do you mean we shouldn't let it pass if the timestamp is double but the
given format is invalid?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
