[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15932645#comment-15932645
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-6107:
---------------------------------------

Github user zentol commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3567
  
    @StephanEwen It enforeces the following rules:
    * every files has to end with a new-line
    * no trailing whitespace *anywhere*
    * every public/protected method/class must have a javadoc
    * imports have to be sorted alphabetically
    * static imports must come first
    * whitespace after commas, semicolons and casts
    * whitespace around operators, if, for, etc.
    * left curly brace (`{`) must not be at the start of the line
    ```
    public MyObject(int a)
    {
    
    =>
    
    public MyObject(int a) {
    ```
    * else/catch/finally must be on the same line as the right curly brace (`}`)
    ```
    if {
    }
    else
    
    =>
    
    if {
    } else
    ```
    * static final variables must be upper case
    * non-static variables must not be upper case
    ```
    ```


> Add custom checkstyle for flink-streaming-java
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-6107
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6107
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: DataStream API
>            Reporter: Aljoscha Krettek
>            Assignee: Aljoscha Krettek
>
> There was some consensus on the ML 
> (https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/94c8c5186b315c58c3f8aaf536501b99e8b92ee97b0034dee295ff6a@%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E)
>  that we want to have a more uniform code style. We should start 
> module-by-module and by introducing increasingly stricter rules. We have to 
> be aware of the PR situation and ensure that we have minimal breakage for 
> contributors.
> This issue aims at adding a custom checkstyle.xml for 
> {{flink-streaming-java}} that is based on our current checkstyle.xml but adds 
> these checks for Javadocs:
> {code}
> <!--
> JAVADOC CHECKS
> -->
> <!-- Checks for Javadoc comments.                     -->
> <!-- See http://checkstyle.sf.net/config_javadoc.html -->
> <module name="JavadocMethod">
>   <property name="scope" value="protected"/>
>   <property name="severity" value="error"/>
>   <property name="allowMissingJavadoc" value="true"/>
>   <property name="allowMissingParamTags" value="true"/>
>   <property name="allowMissingReturnTag" value="true"/>
>   <property name="allowMissingThrowsTags" value="true"/>
>   <property name="allowThrowsTagsForSubclasses" value="true"/>
>   <property name="allowUndeclaredRTE" value="true"/>
> </module>
> <!-- Check that paragraph tags are used correctly in Javadoc. -->
> <module name="JavadocParagraph"/>
> <module name="JavadocType">
>   <property name="scope" value="protected"/>
>   <property name="severity" value="error"/>
>   <property name="allowMissingParamTags" value="true"/>
> </module>
> <module name="JavadocStyle">
>   <property name="severity" value="error"/>
>   <property name="checkHtml" value="true"/>
> </module>
> {code}
> This checks:
>  - Every type has a type-level Javadoc
>  - Proper use of {{<p>}} in Javadocs
>  - First sentence must end with a proper punctuation mark
>  - Proper use (including closing) of HTML tags



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to