[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4545?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15932481#comment-15932481
 ] 

Stephan Ewen commented on FLINK-4545:
-------------------------------------

[~zjwang] The logic outlined above is tailored towards the case where you have 
a container or JVM of a certain size and want to configure how much memory goes 
to what component.

In the case where you actually want to compute the size of the container (as in 
the fine-grained resource configuration code), we probably need a configuration 
parameter for the network memory to add to each container. What do you think?

> Flink automatically manages TM network buffer
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-4545
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4545
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Wish
>          Components: Network
>            Reporter: Zhenzhong Xu
>
> Currently, the number of network buffer per task manager is preconfigured and 
> the memory is pre-allocated through taskmanager.network.numberOfBuffers 
> config. In a Job DAG with shuffle phase, this number can go up very high 
> depends on the TM cluster size. The formula for calculating the buffer count 
> is documented here 
> (https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-master/setup/config.html#configuring-the-network-buffers).
>   
> #slots-per-TM^2 * #TMs * 4
> In a standalone deployment, we may need to control the task manager cluster 
> size dynamically and then leverage the up-coming Flink feature to support 
> scaling job parallelism/rescaling at runtime. 
> If the buffer count config is static at runtime and cannot be changed without 
> restarting task manager process, this may add latency and complexity for 
> scaling process. I am wondering if there is already any discussion around 
> whether the network buffer should be automatically managed by Flink or at 
> least expose some API to allow it to be reconfigured. Let me know if there is 
> any existing JIRA that I should follow.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to