Github user sunjincheng121 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3535#discussion_r105931848
--- Diff:
flink-streaming-java/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/streaming/runtime/operators/windowing/WindowOperator.java
---
@@ -354,22 +354,27 @@ public void merge(W mergeResult,
}
});
- // drop if the window is already late
- if (isLate(actualWindow)) {
-
mergingWindows.retireWindow(actualWindow);
- continue;
- }
+ context.key = key;
+ context.window = actualWindow;
W stateWindow =
mergingWindows.getStateWindow(actualWindow);
if (stateWindow == null) {
throw new IllegalStateException("Window
" + window + " is not in in-flight window set.");
}
windowState.setCurrentNamespace(stateWindow);
- windowState.add(element.getValue());
- context.key = key;
- context.window = actualWindow;
+ // Drop if the window is already late. In rare
cases (with a misbehaving
+ // WindowAssigner) it can happen that a window
becomes late that already has
+ // state (contents, state and timers). That's
why we first get the window state
+ // above and then drop everything.
+ if (isLate(actualWindow)) {
+ clearAllState(actualWindow,
windowState, mergingWindows);
+ mergingWindows.persist();
--- End diff --
Why move `mergingWindows.persist()` from `clearAllState` to here, And we
need not do the null check? How about
```
if (mergingWindows != null) {
mergingWindows.persist();
}
```
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
