Github user clarkyzl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3529#discussion_r105861507
--- Diff: flink-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/types/Row.java ---
@@ -66,10 +66,11 @@ public int getArity() {
* Gets the field at the specified position.
* @param pos The position of the field, 0-based.
* @return The field at the specified position.
- * @throws IndexOutOfBoundsException Thrown, if the position is
negative, or equal to, or larger than the number of fields.
+ * Return null if the position is equal to, or larger than the number
of fields.
+ * @throws IndexOutOfBoundsException Thrown, if the position is
negative.
*/
public Object getField(int pos) {
- return fields[pos];
+ return pos >= fields.length ? null : fields[pos];
--- End diff --
Hi @fhueske . Thank you for your comments. The overhead of `if`s are
additionally caused here. It may not be an efficient way. IMHO, The design of
`TableFunction` support arbitrary types of output Row. However, too many kinds
of `TableFunction`s may also confuse users. I will discover whether there is a
concise and efficient way.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
