MartijnVisser opened a new pull request, #29241:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/29241

   ## What is the purpose of the change
   
   * `JoinSemanticTests[anti-join-on-nested]` asserts the raw changelog, so it 
fails whenever the
     anti join transiently emits and retracts `+I[test_same]`. It failed 11 of 
the 16 release-2.3
     nightlies between 2026-09-10 and 2026-09-17 (8 on Azure, 8 on GitHub 
Actions) and the push run
     of `e10aab797f` (https://github.com/apache/flink/actions/runs/35220462243)
   
   ## Brief change log
   
   * The `anti-join-on-nested` sink asserts the materialized result instead of 
the raw changelog,
     like the other program in the file
   * Not a cherry-pick: master got the line from FLINK-39695 (`4f8b4a88b1e`), 
which also copies
     Calcite classes into the planner and does not belong on a patch branch
   * The companion PR makes the same change on release-2.2; release-1.20 does 
not have this test
   
   ## Verifying this change
   
   This change is already covered by existing tests, such as 
`JoinSemanticTests`.
   
   * each variant compiled once with `./mvnw -o -pl 
flink-table/flink-table-planner test
     -Dtest=JoinSemanticTests`, then looped with `surefire:test`, JDK 17, under 
CPU
     load: 21 of 103 runs failed on `cf7fbd3317d`, 0 of 100 with this commit 
applied
   * changing `NOT EXISTS` to `EXISTS` makes the patched test fail, so the 
assertion still catches a
     regression
   
   ## Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
   
     - Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): no
     - The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with 
`@Public(Evolving)`: no
     - The serializers: no
     - The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): no
     - Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its 
components), Checkpointing, Kubernetes/Yarn, ZooKeeper: no
     - The S3 file system connector: no
   
   ## Documentation
   
     - Does this pull request introduce a new feature? no
     - If yes, how is the feature documented? not applicable
   
   ---
   
   ##### Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
   
   - [X] Yes (please specify the tool below)
   
   Generated-by: Claude Code (Claude Opus 5)
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to