leonardBang commented on PR #4530: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink-cdc/pull/4530#issuecomment-5596839627
> Thanks Lanny for the contribution, please check the CI failing cases as they seems relevant. > > @leonardBang IIRC the TIME(3) precision has been discussed earlier, and the conclusion is we'd better keep the same memory layout with Flink SQL, truncating to 3-digits. As [apache/flink#26954](https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/26954) has extended precision up to 9, should this be reconsidered now? Thanks @tchivs for the contribution and @yuxiqian for the investigation, I think it's time to support TIME(p) with p > 3 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
