weiqingy opened a new issue, #932: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink-agents/issues/932
### Background The ASF publishes [generative tooling guidance](https://www.apache.org/legal/generative-tooling.html), which asks contributors to disclose when generative AI tooling was used to author or co-author a contribution. Our PR template has no field for that today, and `AGENTS.md` does not mention it either, so the disclosure is not surfaced anywhere in this project. Two Apache projects already carry it in their PR templates: - `apache/auron` uses a minimal form: a yes/no question, a `Generated-by: <tool name and version>` instruction, and a link to the ASF guidance. - `apache/flink` uses a longer form: a checkbox, a commented-out `Generated-by` trailer, and a pointer to its `AGENTS.md` for the full policy. ### Proposed change A docs-only change, no behavior impact: 1. Add a "Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?" section to `.github/pull_request_template.md`, following the shorter `apache/auron` shape, with a link to the ASF guidance. 2. Add one line to the "Commit & Pull Request Guidelines" section of `AGENTS.md` recording the same convention, so an agent reading the repo guide knows to fill it in. I have deliberately left out `apache/flink`'s stronger "low-effort AI-generated PRs will be closed" wording. That is a project policy call rather than a mechanical alignment with the ASF guidance, so it seems better raised separately if maintainers want it. I'm willing to submit a PR for this. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
