Dennis-Mircea opened a new pull request, #1078:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator/pull/1078

   
   <!--
   *Thank you very much for contributing to the Apache Flink Kubernetes 
Operator - we are happy that you want to help us improve the project. To help 
the community review your contribution in the best possible way, please go 
through the checklist below, which will get the contribution into a shape in 
which it can be best reviewed.*
   
   ## Contribution Checklist
   
     - Make sure that the pull request corresponds to a [JIRA 
issue](https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/FLINK/issues). Exceptions are 
made for typos in JavaDoc or documentation files, which need no JIRA issue.
     
     - Name the pull request in the form "[FLINK-XXXX] [component] Title of the 
pull request", where *FLINK-XXXX* should be replaced by the actual issue 
number. Skip *component* if you are unsure about which is the best component.
     Typo fixes that have no associated JIRA issue should be named following 
this pattern: `[hotfix][docs] Fix typo in event time introduction` or 
`[hotfix][javadocs] Expand JavaDoc for PuncuatedWatermarkGenerator`.
   
     - Fill out the template below to describe the changes contributed by the 
pull request. That will give reviewers the context they need to do the review.
     
     - Make sure that the change passes the automated tests, i.e., `mvn clean 
verify` passes. You can read more on how we use GitHub Actions for CI 
[here](https://nightlies.apache.org/flink/flink-kubernetes-operator-docs-main/docs/development/guide/#cicd).
   
     - Each pull request should address only one issue, not mix up code from 
multiple issues.
     
     - Each commit in the pull request has a meaningful commit message 
(including the JIRA id)
   
     - Once all items of the checklist are addressed, remove the above text and 
this checklist, leaving only the filled out template below.
   
   
   **(The sections below can be removed for hotfixes of typos)**
   -->
   
   ## What is the purpose of the change
   
   Fixes the inaccurate scaling metric computation for non-source vertices by 
enabling per-second rate metrics (`numRecordsInPerSecond` / 
`numRecordsOutPerSecond`) collection and consumption across the full autoscaler 
pipeline, and replaces endpoint-only getRate() with spike-resilient 
alternatives for gauge metrics like `LAG`.
   
   JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-39306
   
   ## Brief change log
   
   - `FlinkMetric`: Added `NUM_RECORDS_IN_PER_SEC` and 
`NUM_RECORDS_OUT_PER_SEC` enum entries to match Flink's `numRecordsInPerSecond` 
/ `numRecordsOutPerSecond` task-level metrics.
   - `ScalingMetric`: Added `NUM_RECORDS_IN_PER_SECOND` and 
`NUM_RECORDS_OUT_PER_SECOND` scaling metric entries for storing per-second 
rates in the metrics history.
   - `ScalingMetricCollector`: Extended `getFilteredVertexMetricNames` to 
request `NUM_RECORDS_IN_PER_SEC` and `NUM_RECORDS_OUT_PER_SEC` for non-source 
vertices (previously only source-specific metrics were requested).
   - `ScalingMetrics`: Extended `computeDataRateMetrics` to store 
`NUM_RECORDS_IN_PER_SECOND` and `NUM_RECORDS_OUT_PER_SECOND` in the collected 
scaling metrics for non-source vertices when available.
   - `ScalingMetricEvaluator`:
      - Introduced `getAverageWithRateFallback(perSecondMetric, 
accumulatedMetric, ...)` - tries `getAverage(perSecondMetric)` first (direct 
per-second rate from Flink), falls back to `getRate(accumulatedMetric)` 
(endpoint-based delta from accumulated counters) when the per-second metric is 
unavailable.
      - Introduced `getAverageRate(metric, ...)` - computes the average of 
per-interval deltas across the full metrics window, replacing the 
spike-susceptible endpoint-only `getRate()` for gauge metrics like LAG.
      - Replaced all `getRate(NUM_RECORDS_IN, ...)` / `getRate(NUM_RECORDS_OUT, 
...)` calls in `isProcessingBacklog`, `evaluateMetrics`, 
`computeEdgeOutputRatio`, and `computeEdgeDataRate` with 
`getAverageWithRateFallback(NUM_RECORDS_IN_PER_SECOND, NUM_RECORDS_IN, ...)` / 
`getAverageWithRateFallback(NUM_RECORDS_OUT_PER_SECOND, NUM_RECORDS_OUT, ...)`.
      - Replaced `getRate(LAG, ...)` in `computeTargetDataRate` with 
`getAverageRate(LAG, ...)` to avoid diluted lag rate estimation when the 
metrics window is large.
   - `JobAutoScalerImplTest`: Fixed flaky `testMetricReporting` by injecting a 
deterministic `Clock` via `autoscaler.setClock()` to guarantee distinct 
timestamps across metric collections, avoiding the timestamp collision that 
caused the metrics history to stay at size 1.
   
   ## Verifying this change
   This change can be verified by existing unit tests after the flaky test fix. 
Additional UTs to be added to validate:
   - `getAverageWithRateFallback` returns the per-second average when available 
and falls back to getRate when it is not.
   - `getAverageRate` computes the correct average of per-interval deltas and 
is resilient to spikes diluted over a large window.
   - Non-source vertices correctly collect, store, and evaluate 
`NUM_RECORDS_IN_PER_SECOND` / `NUM_RECORDS_OUT_PER_SECOND`.
   
   ## Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
   
     - Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): no
     - The public API, i.e., is any changes to the `CustomResourceDescriptors`: 
no
     - Core observer or reconciler logic that is regularly executed: no
   
   ## Documentation
   
     - Does this pull request introduce a new feature? no
     - If yes, how is the feature documented? not applicable
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to