[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-28639?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17938609#comment-17938609
 ] 

Yunfeng Zhou commented on FLINK-28639:
--------------------------------------

In fact, this issue was introduced to better support non-source operators. As 
for source operators, given that FLIP-27 was proposed far before this issue and 
these sources had been working well before that, they should not have such 
event consistency problems.

We can continue discuss this proposal but I'm not sure if it would be finished 
soon. If it is confirmed that this issue is a blocker for aws connector and 
needs to be fixed ASAP, my suggestion is to check if the fix could be added to 
this connector first, as this approach has been proved in other existing Flink 
connectors.

> Preserve distributed consistency of OperatorEvents from subtasks to 
> OperatorCoordinator
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-28639
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-28639
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Runtime / Checkpointing
>    Affects Versions: 1.14.3
>            Reporter: Yunfeng Zhou
>            Assignee: Yunfeng Zhou
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: pull-request-available, stale-assigned
>
> This is the second step to solving the consistency issue of OC 
> communications. In this step, we would also guarantee the consistency of 
> operator events sent from subtasks to OCs. Combined with the other subtask to 
> preserve the consistency of communications in the reverse direction, all 
> communications between OC and subtasks would be consistent across checkpoints 
> and global failovers.
> To achieve the goal of this step, we need to add closing/reopening functions 
> to the subtasks' gateways and make the subtasks aware of a checkpoint before 
> they receive the checkpoint barriers. The general process would be as follows.
> 1. When the OC starts checkpoint, it notifies all subtasks about this 
> information.
> 2. After being notified about the ongoing checkpoint in OC, a subtask sends a 
> special operator event to its OC, which is the last operator event the OC 
> could receive from the subtask before the subtask completes the checkpoint. 
> Then the subtask closes its gateway.
> 3. After receiving this special event from all subtasks, the OC finishes its 
> checkpoint and closes its gateway. Then the checkpoint coordinator sends 
> checkpoint barriers to the sources.
> 4. If the subtask or the OC generate any event to send to each other, they 
> buffer the events locally.
> 5. When a subtask starts checkpointing, it also stores the buffered events in 
> the checkpoint.
> 6. After the subtask completes the checkpoint, communications in both 
> directions are recovered and the buffered events are sent out.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to