lamgary opened a new pull request, #26129: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/26129
## What is the purpose of the change Improve state processor API performance when reading keyed rocksdb state by allowing duplicates ## Brief change log - Add parameter to KeyedStateInputFormat.java - to allow optionally skipping of deduplication (i.e. removing of keys from flink sttate when reading). I chose to add an extra constructor, so current usages are backwards compatible - Wiring parameter to SavepointReader.java - that can be optionally specified ## Verifying this change // TODO add tests Please make sure both new and modified tests in this PR follow [the conventions for tests defined in our code quality guide](https://flink.apache.org/how-to-contribute/code-style-and-quality-common/#7-testing). *(Please pick either of the following options)* This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage. *(or)* This change is already covered by existing tests, such as *(please describe tests)*. *(or)* This change added tests and can be verified as follows: *(example:)* - *Added integration tests for end-to-end deployment with large payloads (100MB)* - *Extended integration test for recovery after master (JobManager) failure* - *Added test that validates that TaskInfo is transferred only once across recoveries* - *Manually verified the change by running a 4 node cluster with 2 JobManagers and 4 TaskManagers, a stateful streaming program, and killing one JobManager and two TaskManagers during the execution, verifying that recovery happens correctly.* ## Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts: - Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (yes / no) - The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with `@Public(Evolving)`: yes - The serializers: no - The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): no - Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its components), Checkpointing, Kubernetes/Yarn, ZooKeeper: no - The S3 file system connector: no ## Documentation - Does this pull request introduce a new feature? no - If yes, how is the feature documented? not documented (but happy to add where necessary) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@flink.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
