docete commented on code in PR #24818:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/24818#discussion_r1621677150


##########
flink-table/flink-table-planner/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/table/planner/functions/casting/RawToBinaryCastRule.java:
##########
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ public boolean canFail(LogicalType inputLogicalType, 
LogicalType targetLogicalTy
     // new behavior
     isNull$290 = isNull$289;
     if (!isNull$290) {
-        byte[] deserializedByteArray$76 = 
result$289.toBytes(typeSerializer$292);
+        byte[] deserializedByteArray$76 = 
result$289.toBytes(typeSerializer$292.getInnerSerializer());

Review Comment:
   > Why do we actually need the call to `getInnerSerializer()` during runtime 
shouldn't we simply use this serializer as the `typeSerializer$292` for code 
generation? Or does the implementation not allow this?
   
   I think the RAW type should bind with RawValueDataSerializer, and use 
`getInnerSerializer()` in se/de phase. Follow the same pattern also make the  
Generated code more clear. See: `AbstractBinaryWriter::writeRawValue`



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@flink.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to