liuyongvs commented on PR #24526: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/24526#issuecomment-2026479264
@MartijnVisser @dawidwys @snuyanzin I agree with you. That is to say, this semantic alignment with Spark's is clear, with no duplicate elements involved. Consequently, I believe it is also necessary to maintain consistency for array_union/array_except. As of now, array_union has been developed by me, with semantics and behavior aligned with Spark, meaning no duplicates are included. However, array_except https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-31663 does include duplicates, and thus its semantics do not align; it requires modification. Furthermore, array_except was merged in version 1.20, and since 1.20 is currently only a snapshot version and not officially released, there’s no concern of causing compatibility issues due to changing behaviors, so it should indeed be corrected. What are your thoughts? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@flink.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
