[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Jinzhong Li updated FLINK-34670:
--------------------------------
    Description: 
Now, the asyncOperations ThreadPoolExecutor of SubtaskCheckpointCoordinatorImpl 
is create with a LinkedBlockingQueue and zero corePoolSize.

!image-2024-03-14-20-24-14-198.png|width=614,height=198!

And in the ThreadPoolExecutor, except for the first time the task is submitted, 
*no* new thread is created until the queue is full. But the capacity of 
LinkedBlockingQueue is Integer.Max. This means that there is almost *only one 
thread* working in this thread pool, *even if* {*}there are many concurrent 
checkpoint requests or checkpoint abort requests waiting to be processed{*}.

!image-2024-03-14-20-27-37-540.png|width=614,height=175!

This problem can be verified by changing ExecutorService implementation in UT 
SubtaskCheckpointCoordinatorTest#testNotifyCheckpointAbortedDuringAsyncPhase. 
When the LinkedBlockingQueue is used, this UT will deadlock because only one 
worker thread can be created.
!image-2024-03-14-20-33-28-851.png|width=606,height=235!

  was:
Now, the asyncOperations ThreadPoolExecutor of SubtaskCheckpointCoordinatorImpl 
is create with a LinkedBlockingQueue and zero corePoolSize.

!image-2024-03-14-20-24-14-198.png|width=614,height=198!

And in the ThreadPoolExecutor, except for the first time the task is submitted, 
*no* new thread is created until the queue is full. But the capacity of 
LinkedBlockingQueue is Integer.Max. This means that there is almost *only one 
thread* working in this thread pool, even if {*}there are many concurrent 
checkpoint requests or checkpoint abort requests waiting to be processed{*}.

!image-2024-03-14-20-27-37-540.png|width=614,height=175!

This problem can be verified by changing ExecutorService implementation in UT 
SubtaskCheckpointCoordinatorTest#testNotifyCheckpointAbortedDuringAsyncPhase. 
When the LinkedBlockingQueue is used, this UT will deadlock because only one 
worker thread can be created.
!image-2024-03-14-20-33-28-851.png|width=606,height=235!


> The asyncOperationsThreadPool in SubtaskCheckpointCoordinatorImpl can only 
> create one worker thread
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-34670
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34670
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Runtime / Checkpointing, Runtime / State Backends
>    Affects Versions: 1.18.0, 1.19.0
>            Reporter: Jinzhong Li
>            Priority: Critical
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 1.20.0
>
>         Attachments: image-2024-03-14-20-24-14-198.png, 
> image-2024-03-14-20-27-37-540.png, image-2024-03-14-20-33-28-851.png
>
>
> Now, the asyncOperations ThreadPoolExecutor of 
> SubtaskCheckpointCoordinatorImpl is create with a LinkedBlockingQueue and 
> zero corePoolSize.
> !image-2024-03-14-20-24-14-198.png|width=614,height=198!
> And in the ThreadPoolExecutor, except for the first time the task is 
> submitted, *no* new thread is created until the queue is full. But the 
> capacity of LinkedBlockingQueue is Integer.Max. This means that there is 
> almost *only one thread* working in this thread pool, *even if* {*}there are 
> many concurrent checkpoint requests or checkpoint abort requests waiting to 
> be processed{*}.
> !image-2024-03-14-20-27-37-540.png|width=614,height=175!
> This problem can be verified by changing ExecutorService implementation in UT 
> SubtaskCheckpointCoordinatorTest#testNotifyCheckpointAbortedDuringAsyncPhase. 
> When the LinkedBlockingQueue is used, this UT will deadlock because only one 
> worker thread can be created.
> !image-2024-03-14-20-33-28-851.png|width=606,height=235!



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to