grzegorz8 commented on code in PR #67:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/flink-connector-jdbc/pull/67#discussion_r1420783379
##########
flink-connector-jdbc/pom.xml:
##########
@@ -38,10 +38,12 @@ under the License.
<scala.binary.version>2.12</scala.binary.version>
<scala-library.version>2.12.7</scala-library.version>
<assertj.version>3.23.1</assertj.version>
+ <jackson.version>2.15.2</jackson.version>
<postgres.version>42.5.1</postgres.version>
<oracle.version>21.8.0.0</oracle.version>
<trino.version>418</trino.version>
<byte-buddy.version>1.12.10</byte-buddy.version>
+ <elasticsearch.version>8.11.1</elasticsearch.version>
Review Comment:
@MartijnVisser Hi! What should be done to ensure if adding this dependency
(even as "provided") is allowed? The same question for enabling Elastic trial
for testing purposes.
Should I create a ticket somewhere? Write to elastic_lice...@elastic.co?
What do you suggest? Or should we already close the PR and corresponding ticket
due to incompatible license?
The license is not listed on Category X:
https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x (nor in any other).
Assuming Elastic License is "Category X", I think we are still safe, since we
do not violate the following rules mentioned in the document: _"They may not be
distributed"_ and _"You may rely on them when they support an optional
feature"_.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@flink.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
