morhidi commented on code in PR #670:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator/pull/670#discussion_r1323483540
##########
flink-kubernetes-operator/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/kubernetes/operator/config/FlinkConfigBuilder.java:
##########
@@ -420,13 +421,24 @@ private void setResource(Resource resource, Configuration
effectiveConfig, boole
? JobManagerOptions.TOTAL_PROCESS_MEMORY
: TaskManagerOptions.TOTAL_PROCESS_MEMORY;
if (resource.getMemory() != null) {
- effectiveConfig.setString(memoryConfigOption.key(),
resource.getMemory());
+ effectiveConfig.setString(
+ memoryConfigOption.key(),
parseResourceMemoryString(resource.getMemory()));
}
configureCpu(resource, effectiveConfig, isJM);
}
}
+ // Using the K8s units specification for the JM and TM memory settings
+ private String parseResourceMemoryString(String memory) {
+ try {
+ return MemorySize.parse(memory).toString();
Review Comment:
What are we solving with the current implementation exactly? Do we want to
be backward compatible with an originally flawed logic?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@flink.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
