[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-32895?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17763530#comment-17763530
 ] 

Zhu Zhu commented on FLINK-32895:
---------------------------------

Either option sounds good to me. Feel free to start the discussion earlier if 
you feel there are much uncertainty which needs to be addressed earlier.

> user may want to restart this job multiple times using max-backoff before 
> failing it.
Yes you are right. Yet maybe we can give it a more user friendly name. e.g. 
`max-attempts-before-reset-backoff` looks better to me.

> Introduce the max attempts for Exponential Delay Restart Strategy
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-32895
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-32895
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Runtime / Coordination
>            Reporter: Rui Fan
>            Assignee: Rui Fan
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>
> Currently, Flink has 3 restart strategies, they are: fixed-delay, 
> failure-rate and exponential-delay.
> The exponential-delay is suitable if a job continues to fail for a period of 
> time. The fixed-delay and failure-rate has the max attempts mechanism, that 
> means, the job won't restart and go to fail after the attempt exceeds the 
> threshold of max attempts. 
> The max attempts mechanism is reasonable, flink should not or need to 
> infinitely restart the job if the job keeps failing. However, the 
> exponential-delay doesn't have the max attempts mechanism.
> I propose introducing the 
> `restart-strategy.exponential-delay.max-attempts-before-reset` to support the 
> max attempts mechanism for exponential-delay. It means flink won't restart 
> job if the number of job failures before reset exceeds 
> max-attempts-before-reset when is exponential-delay is enabled.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to