[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-32544?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chesnay Schepler closed FLINK-32544.
------------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 1.18.0
Resolution: Fixed
master: 0e44dccf694884d60c3cddcb104a3966e11a2dd8
> PythonFunctionFactoryTest fails on Java 17
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-32544
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-32544
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: API / Python, Legacy Components / Flink on Tez
> Affects Versions: 1.18.0
> Reporter: Chesnay Schepler
> Assignee: Dian Fu
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Fix For: 1.18.0
>
>
> https://dev.azure.com/chesnay/flink/_build/results?buildId=3676&view=logs&j=fba17979-6d2e-591d-72f1-97cf42797c11&t=727942b6-6137-54f7-1ef9-e66e706ea068
> {code}
> Jul 05 10:17:23 Exception in thread "main"
> java.lang.reflect.InaccessibleObjectException: Unable to make field private
> static java.util.IdentityHashMap java.lang.ApplicationShutdownHooks.hooks
> accessible: module java.base does not "opens java.lang" to unnamed module
> @1880a322
> Jul 05 10:17:23 at
> java.base/java.lang.reflect.AccessibleObject.checkCanSetAccessible(AccessibleObject.java:354)
> Jul 05 10:17:23 at
> java.base/java.lang.reflect.AccessibleObject.checkCanSetAccessible(AccessibleObject.java:297)
> Jul 05 10:17:23 at
> java.base/java.lang.reflect.Field.checkCanSetAccessible(Field.java:178)
> Jul 05 10:17:23 at
> java.base/java.lang.reflect.Field.setAccessible(Field.java:172)
> Jul 05 10:17:23 at
> org.apache.flink.client.python.PythonFunctionFactoryTest.closeStartedPythonProcess(PythonFunctionFactoryTest.java:115)
> Jul 05 10:17:23 at
> org.apache.flink.client.python.PythonFunctionFactoryTest.cleanEnvironment(PythonFunctionFactoryTest.java:79)
> Jul 05 10:17:23 at
> org.apache.flink.client.python.PythonFunctionFactoryTest.main(PythonFunctionFactoryTest.java:52)
> {code}
> Side-notes:
> * maybe re-evaluate if the test could be run through maven now
> * The shutdown hooks business is quite sketchy, and AFAICT would be
> unnecessary if the test were an ITCase
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
