[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17708345#comment-17708345 ]
Lyn Zhang commented on FLINK-18996: ----------------------------------- [~lincoln.86xy] I can't edit this issue, seems only reporter can fill the 'release note' field !image-2023-04-04-18-02-45-202.png|width=337,height=227! !image-2023-04-04-18-04-36-497.png|width=448,height=216! > Avoid disorder for time interval join > ------------------------------------- > > Key: FLINK-18996 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18996 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Table SQL / Runtime > Reporter: Benchao Li > Assignee: Lyn Zhang > Priority: Major > Labels: auto-deprioritized-critical, auto-deprioritized-major, > pull-request-available > Fix For: 1.18.0 > > Attachments: image-2023-04-04-18-02-45-202.png, > image-2023-04-04-18-04-36-497.png > > > Currently, the time interval join will produce data with rowtime later than > watermark. If we use the rowtime again in downstream, e.t. window > aggregation, we'll lose some data. > > reported from user-zh: > [http://apache-flink.147419.n8.nabble.com/Re-flink-interval-join-tc4458.html#none] -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)