[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-31089?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17693581#comment-17693581
]
xiaogang zhou commented on FLINK-31089:
---------------------------------------
[~Yanfei Lei] yes, your summary is pretty accurate. except pin l0 can improve
the performance, but disable it will not influence too much. But this is not
the main topic.
My job is a datastream job, my point is to prompt some warning as developer may
forget to set the stateTtlConfig whereas they turn on the
PinTopLevelIndexAndFilter. this can 100% lead to some oom issue.
> pin L0 index in memory can lead to slow memory grow finally lead to memory
> beyond limit
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-31089
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-31089
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Runtime / State Backends
> Affects Versions: 1.16.1
> Reporter: xiaogang zhou
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: image-2023-02-15-20-26-58-604.png,
> image-2023-02-15-20-32-17-993.png, image-2023-02-17-16-48-59-535.png,
> l0pin_open.png
>
>
> with the setPinL0FilterAndIndexBlocksInCache true, we can see the pinned
> memory kept growing(in the pc blow from 48G-> 50G in about 5 hours). But if
> we switch it to false, we can see the pinned memory stay realtive static. In
> our environment, a lot of tasks restart due to memory over limit killed by k8s
> !image-2023-02-15-20-26-58-604.png|width=899,height=447!
>
> !image-2023-02-15-20-32-17-993.png|width=853,height=464!
> the two graphs are recorded in yesterday and today, which means the data
> stream number per second will not differ alot.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
