gaoyunhaii commented on code in PR #21546:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/21546#discussion_r1090468404


##########
flink-streaming-java/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/streaming/api/operators/async/AsyncWaitOperator.java:
##########
@@ -442,36 +456,50 @@ public RetryableResultHandlerDelegator(
             this.processingTimeService = processingTimeService;
         }
 
-        public void registerTimeout(long timeout) {
-            resultHandler.registerTimeout(processingTimeService, timeout);
+        private void registerTimeout(long timeout) {
+            resultHandler.timeoutTimer =
+                    registerTimer(processingTimeService, timeout, t -> 
timerTriggered());
+        }
+
+        private void cancelRetryTimer() {
+            if (delayedRetryTimer != null) {
+                delayedRetryTimer.cancel(true);

Review Comment:
   We may use false here to avoid interrupt the timer thread unexpectically and 
cause possible failures. 



##########
flink-streaming-java/src/test/java/org/apache/flink/streaming/api/operators/async/AsyncWaitOperatorTest.java:
##########
@@ -1260,6 +1263,79 @@ private void testProcessingTimeWithRetry(
         }
     }
 
+    /**
+     * Test the AsyncWaitOperator with an always-timeout async function under 
unordered mode and
+     * processing time.
+     */
+    @Test
+    public void testProcessingTimeWithTimeoutFunctionUnorderedWithRetry() 
throws Exception {
+        
testProcessingTimeAlwaysTimeoutFunctionWithRetry(AsyncDataStream.OutputMode.UNORDERED);
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * Test the AsyncWaitOperator with an always-timeout async function under 
ordered mode and
+     * processing time.
+     */
+    @Test
+    public void testProcessingTimeWithTimeoutFunctionOrderedWithRetry() throws 
Exception {
+        
testProcessingTimeAlwaysTimeoutFunctionWithRetry(AsyncDataStream.OutputMode.ORDERED);
+    }
+
+    private void 
testProcessingTimeAlwaysTimeoutFunctionWithRetry(AsyncDataStream.OutputMode 
mode)
+            throws Exception {
+
+        StreamTaskMailboxTestHarnessBuilder<Integer> builder =
+                new StreamTaskMailboxTestHarnessBuilder<>(
+                                OneInputStreamTask::new, 
BasicTypeInfo.INT_TYPE_INFO)
+                        .addInput(BasicTypeInfo.INT_TYPE_INFO);
+
+        AsyncRetryStrategy exceptionRetryStrategy =
+                new AsyncRetryStrategies.FixedDelayRetryStrategyBuilder(5, 
100L)
+                        .ifException(RetryPredicates.HAS_EXCEPTION_PREDICATE)
+                        .build();
+        AlwaysTimeoutWithDefaultValueAsyncFunction asyncFunction =
+                new AlwaysTimeoutWithDefaultValueAsyncFunction();
+
+        try (StreamTaskMailboxTestHarness<Integer> testHarness =
+                builder.setupOutputForSingletonOperatorChain(
+                                new AsyncWaitOperatorFactory<>(
+                                        asyncFunction, TIMEOUT, 10, mode, 
exceptionRetryStrategy))
+                        .build()) {
+
+            final long initialTime = 0L;
+            final Queue<Object> expectedOutput = new ArrayDeque<>();
+
+            testHarness.processElement(new StreamRecord<>(1, initialTime + 1));
+            testHarness.processElement(new StreamRecord<>(2, initialTime + 2));
+
+            expectedOutput.add(new StreamRecord<>(-1, initialTime + 1));
+            expectedOutput.add(new StreamRecord<>(-1, initialTime + 2));
+
+            Deadline deadline = Deadline.fromNow(Duration.ofSeconds(10));
+            while (testHarness.getOutput().size() < expectedOutput.size()
+                    && deadline.hasTimeLeft()) {
+                testHarness.processAll();
+                //noinspection BusyWait
+                Thread.sleep(100);
+            }
+
+            if (mode == AsyncDataStream.OutputMode.ORDERED) {
+                TestHarnessUtil.assertOutputEquals(
+                        "ORDERED Output was not correct.", expectedOutput, 
testHarness.getOutput());
+            } else {
+                TestHarnessUtil.assertOutputEqualsSorted(
+                        "UNORDERED Output was not correct.",
+                        expectedOutput,
+                        testHarness.getOutput(),
+                        new StreamRecordComparator());
+            }
+
+            // verify the elements' try count
+            assertTrue(asyncFunction.getTryCount(1) == 2);

Review Comment:
   Here we relies on TIMEOUT and the `sleep(500)` in the testing async 
function. In consideration of the status of the testing machine, there might be 
drift for the timers, which might cause the counts to be other values. 
   
   For now we may first make it <= 2, and see if the 500 slack is large enough 
for the other side. If there are failures, we may need to change to some kind 
of more  deterministic logic. 



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@flink.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to