[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-25325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17599340#comment-17599340
]
Matthias Pohl commented on FLINK-25325:
---------------------------------------
[~hxb] I feel like it should be ok to continue merging the PRs related to the
JUnit5 migration even though we're still in feature freeze mode/the release
branch not being cut, yet. But I wanted to verify with you on that one. WDYT?
> Migration Flink from Junit4 to Junit5
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-25325
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-25325
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Tests
> Affects Versions: 1.14.0
> Reporter: Jing Ge
> Priority: Major
> Labels: Umbrella
> Fix For: 1.17.0
>
>
> Based on the consensus from the mailing list discussion[1][2], we have been
> starting working on the JUnit4 to JUnit5 migration.
> This is the umbrella ticket which describes the big picture of the migration
> with following steps:
> * AssertJ integration and guideline
> * Test Framework upgrade from JUnit4 to JUnit5
> * JUnit5 migration guideline(document and reference migration)
> * Optimization for issues found while writing new test in JUint5
> * [Long-term]Module based graceful migration of old tests in JUnit4 to JUnit5
>
> All JUnit5 migration related tasks are welcome to be created under this
> umbrella.
>
>
> [1] [[DISCUSS]Moving to
> JUnit5|https://lists.apache.org/thread/jsjvc2cqb91pyh47d4p6olk3c1vxqm3w]
> [2] [[DISCUSS] Conventions on assertions to use in
> tests|https://lists.apache.org/thread/33t7hz8w873p1bc5msppk65792z08rgt]
> [3] [JUnit5 migration
> guide|https://docs.google.com/document/d/1514Wa_aNB9bJUen4xm5uiuXOooOJTtXqS_Jqk9KJitU/edit]
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
