Github user ggevay commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2211#discussion_r77993022
--- Diff:
flink-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/api/java/typeutils/PojoTypeInfo.java
---
@@ -419,4 +481,61 @@ public String toString() {
return "NamedFlatFieldDescriptor [name="+fieldName+"
position="+getPosition()+" typeInfo="+getType()+"]";
}
}
+
+ public static String accessStringForField(Field f) {
+ String fieldName = f.getName();
+ if (Modifier.isPublic(f.getModifiers())) {
+ return fieldName;
+ }
+ String getterName = "get" +
Character.toUpperCase(fieldName.charAt(0)) + fieldName.substring(1);
+ Class parentClazz = f.getDeclaringClass();
+ try {
+ parentClazz.getMethod(getterName, new Class[0]);
+ } catch (NoSuchMethodException e) {
+ // No getter, it might be a scala class.
--- End diff --
Is this possible at this point? The rules of being a POJO should not allow
this, right?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
