fredia commented on PR #19448:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/19448#issuecomment-1171001821

   I re-run the benchmark of this PR and master, and filter out the item that 
regression>5%, here are top regressions from jenkins's results:
   
   <google-sheets-html-origin><!--td {border: 1px solid #ccc;}br 
{mso-data-placement:same-cell;}-->
   
   Benchmark | Unit |  [PR 
run#1](http://codespeed.dak8s.net:8080/job/flink-benchmark-request/159/) |   
[PR run#2](http://codespeed.dak8s.net:8080/job/flink-benchmark-request/160/) |  
[master 
run#1](http://codespeed.dak8s.net:8080/job/flink-master-benchmarks-java8/448/) 
| [master 
run#2](http://codespeed.dak8s.net:8080/job/flink-benchmark-request/161/) | param
   -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | --
   
org.apache.flink.benchmark.BlockingPartitionBenchmark.uncompressedMmapPartition 
| ops/ms | 8666.328735 | 9042.724129 | 9446.251683 | 9157.253861 |  
   org.apache.flink.benchmark.InputBenchmark.mapRebalanceMapSink | ops/ms | 
15071.44224 | 13998.4278 | 13563.52986 | 14826.58196 |  
   org.apache.flink.benchmark.MultipleInputBenchmark.multiInputOneIdleMapSink | 
ops/ms | 9849.316859 | 10965.11345 | 10850.4832 | 10897.66905 |  
   org.apache.flink.benchmark.RemoteChannelThroughputBenchmark.remoteRebalance 
| ops/ms | 16325.58916 | 16523.94144 | 16774.34937 | 17514.40819 | DEBLOAT
   
org.apache.flink.benchmark.StreamNetworkThroughputBenchmarkExecutor.networkThroughput
 | ops/ms | 65898.42896 | 61612.85227 | 68250.9443 | 68369.23892 | 100,100ms
   org.apache.flink.benchmark.TwoInputBenchmark.twoInputMapSink | ops/ms | 
17380.14833 | 17777.86862 | 17506.91314 | 18379.76836 |  
   org.apache.flink.benchmark.WindowBenchmarks.globalWindow | ops/ms | 
6066.933889 | 6326.320592 | 6621.917999 | 6370.900111 |  
   org.apache.flink.benchmark.WindowBenchmarks.slidingWindow | ops/ms | 
660.021689 | 685.552758 | 701.218769 | 663.998936 |  
   
   
   
   and I also re-run `remoteRebalance`, `networkThroughput`,` globalWindow` on 
my local machine:
   
   
`org.apache.flink.benchmark.RemoteChannelThroughputBenchmark.remoteRebalance`:
   <google-sheets-html-origin><!--td {border: 1px solid #ccc;}br 
{mso-data-placement:same-cell;}-->
     | run#1 | run#2 | run#3 | run#4
   -- | -- | -- | -- | --
   master | 14376.388 ± 916.003 | 14346.302 ± 1222.127 | 16307.239 ± 532.418 | 
12082.863 ± 1558.623
   PR19448 | 14503.878 ± 1245.878 | 13375.936 ± 1423.362 | 13242.821 ± 1636.507 
| 13585.857 ± 1020.836
   
   
`org.apache.flink.benchmark.StreamNetworkThroughputBenchmarkExecutor.networkThroughput`:
   <google-sheets-html-origin><!--td {border: 1px solid #ccc;}br 
{mso-data-placement:same-cell;}-->
   
     | run#1 | run#2 | run#3 | run#4
   -- | -- | -- | -- | --
   master | 60693.460 ± 3910.983 | 67485.945 ± 2368.999 | 67428.326 ± 2640.449 
| 65570.558 ± 4839.778
   PR19448 | 62581.403 ± 3676.553 | 68797.921 ± 2080.682 | 59300.429 ± 9673.195 
| 70301.194 ± 1727.879
   
   `org.apache.flink.benchmark.WindowBenchmarks.globalWindow`:
   
   <google-sheets-html-origin><!--td {border: 1px solid #ccc;}br 
{mso-data-placement:same-cell;}-->
   
     | run#1 | run#2 | run#3 | run#4
   -- | -- | -- | -- | --
   master | 5528.938 ± 1420.702 | 6685.339 ± 350.645 | 6678.014 ± 353.418 | 
6374.245 ± 947.530
   PR19448 | 6536.733 ± 571.271 | 6789.017 ± 247.339 | 6836.893 ± 369.841 | 
6973.793 ± 240.786
   
   According to the above data, this PR is **not always worse than** master,  
so I think that the regressions are caused by noise.  @rkhachatryan WDYT?
   
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@flink.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to