Github user fhueske commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2319#discussion_r75479103
--- Diff:
flink-libraries/flink-table/src/test/scala/org/apache/flink/api/table/expressions/CompositeAccessTest.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,167 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+
+package org.apache.flink.api.table.expressions
+
+import org.apache.calcite.tools.ValidationException
+import org.apache.flink.api.common.typeinfo.TypeInformation
+import org.apache.flink.api.java.typeutils.{TupleTypeInfo, TypeExtractor}
+import org.apache.flink.api.scala.createTypeInformation
+import org.apache.flink.api.scala.table._
+import org.apache.flink.api.table
+import org.apache.flink.api.table.{Row, Types}
+import
org.apache.flink.api.table.expressions.CompositeAccessTest.{MyCaseClass,
MyCaseClass2, MyPojo}
+import org.apache.flink.api.table.expressions.utils.ExpressionTestBase
+import org.apache.flink.api.table.typeutils.RowTypeInfo
+import org.junit.Test
+
+
+class CompositeAccessTest extends ExpressionTestBase {
+
+ @Test
+ def testGetField(): Unit = {
+
+ testAllApis(
+ 'f0.getField("intField"),
+ "f0.getField('intField')",
+ "testTable.f0.intField",
+ "42")
+
+ testTableApi(
+ 'f0.getField(0),
+ "f0.getField(0)",
+ "42")
+
+ testSqlApi("testTable.f0.stringField", "Bob")
+
+ testSqlApi("testTable.f0.booleanField", "true")
+
+ testAllApis(
+ 'f1.getField("objectField").getField("intField"),
+ "f1.getField('objectField').getField('intField')",
+ "testTable.f1.objectField.intField",
+ "25")
+
+ testSqlApi("testTable.f1.objectField.stringField", "Timo")
+
+ testSqlApi("testTable.f1.objectField.booleanField", "false")
+
+ testAllApis(
+ 'f2.getField(0),
+ "f2.getField(0)",
+ "testTable.f2._1",
+ "a")
+
+ testSqlApi("testTable.f3.f1", "b")
+
+ testSqlApi("testTable.f4.myString", "Hello")
+
+ testSqlApi("testTable.f5", "13")
+
+ testSqlApi("testTable.f6", "null")
+
+ testAllApis(
+ 'f7.getField("_1"),
+ "getField(f7, '_1')",
+ "testTable.f7._1",
+ "true")
+
+ // TODO Not supported by Calcite
+ // you cannot get a composite type
+ // testSqlApi("testTable.f1.objectField", "25")
--- End diff --
I tried this case and got a Calcite exception which was not very helpful.
Can we improve the exception for this error?
Do you think we should open an issue in the Calcite JIRA to support this
case, @twalthr?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
