Github user tillrohrmann commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2305
+1 for this approach.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 6:59 AM, Jark <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm ok with the with(...) approach. In addition, we should create a JIRA
> under [FLINK-3957]
> "Breaking API changes for Flink 2.0", to keep track of deprecating and
> changing the apply method return type.
>
> â
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2305#issuecomment-240624274>, or
mute
> the thread
>
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFfXul4OQ2wEhcdMXC3_gqtZ-zqEIV6Kks5qg-bNgaJpZM4JW9go>
> .
>
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
