[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20614?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Flink Jira Bot updated FLINK-20614:
-----------------------------------
Labels: auto-deprioritized-critical auto-deprioritized-major stale-minor
(was: auto-deprioritized-critical auto-deprioritized-major)
I am the [Flink Jira Bot|https://github.com/apache/flink-jira-bot/] and I help
the community manage its development. I see this issues has been marked as
Minor but is unassigned and neither itself nor its Sub-Tasks have been updated
for 180 days. I have gone ahead and marked it "stale-minor". If this ticket is
still Minor, please either assign yourself or give an update. Afterwards,
please remove the label or in 7 days the issue will be deprioritized.
> Registered sql drivers not deregistered after task finished in session cluster
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-20614
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20614
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Connectors / JDBC, Runtime / Task
> Affects Versions: 1.12.0, 1.13.0
> Reporter: Kezhu Wang
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: auto-deprioritized-critical, auto-deprioritized-major,
> stale-minor
>
> {{DriverManager}} keeps registered drivers in its internal data structures
> which prevents they from gc after task finished. I confirm it in standalone
> session cluster by observing that {{ChildFirstClassLoader}} could not be
> reclaimed after several {{GC.run}}, it should exist in all session clusters.
> Tomcat documents
> [this|https://ci.apache.org/projects/tomcat/tomcat85/docs/jndi-datasource-examples-howto.html#DriverManager,_the_service_provider_mechanism_and_memory_leaks]
> and fixes/circumvents this with
> [JdbcLeakPrevention|https://github.com/apache/tomcat/blob/master/java/org/apache/catalina/loader/JdbcLeakPrevention.java#L30].
> Should we solve this in runtime ? Or treat it as connector and clients'
> responsibility to solve it using
> {{RuntimeContext.registerUserCodeClassLoaderReleaseHookIfAbsent}} or similar ?
> Personally, it would be nice to solve in runtime as a catch-all to avoid
> memory-leaking and provide consistent behavior to clients cross per-job and
> session mode.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
