[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Flink Jira Bot updated FLINK-6309:
----------------------------------
    Labels: auto-deprioritized-major auto-unassigned stale-minor  (was: 
auto-deprioritized-major auto-unassigned)

I am the [Flink Jira Bot|https://github.com/apache/flink-jira-bot/] and I help 
the community manage its development. I see this issues has been marked as 
Minor but is unassigned and neither itself nor its Sub-Tasks have been updated 
for 180 days. I have gone ahead and marked it "stale-minor". If this ticket is 
still Minor, please either assign yourself or give an update. Afterwards, 
please remove the label or in 7 days the issue will be deprioritized.


> Memory consumer weights should be calculated in job vertex level
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-6309
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6309
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: API / DataSet
>            Reporter: Kurt Young
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: auto-deprioritized-major, auto-unassigned, stale-minor
>
> Currently, in {{PlanFinalizer}}, we travel all the job vertices to calculate 
> the consumer weights of the memory and then assign the weights for each job 
> vertex. In the case of a large job graph, e.g. with multiple joins, group 
> reduces, the value of consumer weights will be very high and the available 
> memory for each job vertex will be very low.
> I think it makes more sense to calculate the consumer weights of the memory 
> at the job vertex level (after chaining), in order to maximize the usage 
> ratio of the memory.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)

Reply via email to