[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3761?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15298360#comment-15298360
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-3761:
---------------------------------------

Github user aljoscha commented on the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1988#issuecomment-221311349
  
    Jip, this last paragraph with the Factory is what I hinted at with my 
comment. 😃 This may be somewhat academic but if there is a method 
`getPartitionedStateBackend` the likelihood of it being wrongly used is 
somewhat high.


> Introduce key group state backend
> ---------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-3761
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3761
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: state backends
>            Reporter: Till Rohrmann
>            Assignee: Till Rohrmann
>
> After an off-line discussion with [~aljoscha], we came to the conclusion that 
> it would be beneficial to reflect the differences between a keyed and a 
> non-keyed stream also in the state backends. A state backend which is used 
> for a keyed stream offers a value, list, folding and value state and has to 
> group its keys into key groups. 
> A state backend for non-keyed streams can only offer a union state to make it 
> work with dynamic scaling. A union state is a state which is broadcasted to 
> all tasks in case of a recovery. The state backends can then select what 
> information they need to recover from the whole state (formerly distributed).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to