[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19954?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Flink Jira Bot updated FLINK-19954:
-----------------------------------
      Labels: auto-deprioritized-major  (was: stale-major)
    Priority: Minor  (was: Major)

This issue was labeled "stale-major" 7 ago and has not received any updates so 
it is being deprioritized. If this ticket is actually Major, please raise the 
priority and ask a committer to assign you the issue or revive the public 
discussion.


> Move execution deployment tracking logic from legacy EG code to SchedulerNG
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-19954
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19954
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Runtime / Coordination
>    Affects Versions: 1.12.0
>            Reporter: Andrey Zagrebin
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: auto-deprioritized-major
>
> FLINK-17075 introduced the execution state reconciliation between TM and JM. 
> The reconciliation requires tracking of the execution deployment state. The 
> tracking logic was added to the legacy code of EG state handling which is 
> partially inactive as discussed in FLINK-19927. The recent state handling 
> logic resides in the new SchedulerNG, currently DefaultScheduler.
> We could reconsider how the execution tracking for reconciliation is 
> integrated with the scheduling. I think the tracking logic could be moved 
> from Execution#deploy and EG#notifyExecutionChange to either 
> SchedulerNG#updateTaskExecutionState or DefaultScheduler#deployTaskSafe. The 
> latter looks to me currently more natural. ExecutionVertexOperations.deploy 
> could return submission future for deployment completion in 
> ExecutionDeploymentTracker and Execution#getTerminalFuture to stop the 
> tracking. This would be also easier to unit test.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to