[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17545?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17327847#comment-17327847
 ] 

Flink Jira Bot commented on FLINK-17545:
----------------------------------------

This major issue is unassigned and itself and all of its Sub-Tasks have not 
been updated for 30 days. So, it has been labeled "stale-major". If this ticket 
is indeed "major", please either assign yourself or give an update. Afterwards, 
please remove the label. In 7 days the issue will be deprioritized.

> Resource leak JDBCUpsertOutputFormat
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-17545
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17545
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Connectors / JDBC
>    Affects Versions: 1.10.0
>            Reporter: John Lonergan
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: stale-major
>
> See also FLINK-17544 for background to this scenario.
> Synchronisation in JDBCUpsertOutputFormat allows resources leaks.
> The close() method is synchronised with write() and flush() but not open.
> So if open() is a slow call (which in my case it occasionally is) then it may 
> not be complete when close() is called.
> In this situation the open() method will eventually proceed to open resources 
> such as database connections that will never be closed by the program.
> So if we are +not+ going to synchronise open() with the other methods then an 
> alternative approach would be to have open() do a double check before 
> returning.
> ie Just before open() completes it would need to synchonise and then check if 
> close has already been called whilst open() was running.
> If so then open() should proceed to undo any resources it has just opened.
> One could perhaps argue that there's a problem with the state model if the 
> framework might call close before open has completed; but I can imagine why 
> this happens. 
> However, the must therefore deal with the consequential complexity of this 
> deal with the threading issues effectively.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to