Github user dawidwys commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1848#discussion_r60409121
  
    --- Diff: 
flink-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/flink/test/javaApiOperators/PartitionITCase.java
 ---
    @@ -546,43 +549,274 @@ public void testRangePartitionInIteration() throws 
Exception {
                result.collect(); // should fail
        }
     
    +
    +
    +   @Test
    +   public void testRangePartitionerOnSequenceDataWithOrders() throws 
Exception {
    +           final ExecutionEnvironment env = 
ExecutionEnvironment.getExecutionEnvironment();
    +           DataSet<Tuple2<Long, Long>> dataSet = env.generateSequence(0, 
10000)
    +                           .map(new MapFunction<Long, Tuple2<Long, 
Long>>() {
    +                   @Override
    +                   public Tuple2<Long, Long> map(Long value) throws 
Exception {
    +                           return new Tuple2<>(value / 5000, value % 5000);
    +                   }
    +           });
    +
    +           final Tuple2Comparator<Long> tuple2Comparator = new 
Tuple2Comparator<>(new LongComparator(true),
    +                                                                           
                                                                           new 
LongComparator(false));
    +
    +           MinMaxSelector<Tuple2<Long, Long>> minMaxSelector = new 
MinMaxSelector<>(tuple2Comparator);
    +
    +           final List<Tuple2<Tuple2<Long, Long>, Tuple2<Long, Long>>> 
collected = dataSet.partitionByRange(0, 1)
    +                           .withOrders(Order.ASCENDING, Order.DESCENDING)
    +                           .mapPartition(minMaxSelector)
    +                           .collect();
    +
    +           Collections.sort(collected, new 
Tuple2Comparator<>(tuple2Comparator));
    +
    +           Tuple2<Long, Long> previousMax = null;
    +           for (Tuple2<Tuple2<Long, Long>, Tuple2<Long, Long>> tuple2 : 
collected) {
    +            assertTrue("Min element in each partition should be smaller 
than max.",
    +                    tuple2Comparator.compare(tuple2.f0, tuple2.f1) <= 0);
    +                   if (previousMax == null) {
    +                           previousMax = tuple2.f1;
    +                   } else {
    +                assertTrue("Partitions overlap. Previous max should be 
smaller than current min.",
    +                        tuple2Comparator.compare(previousMax, tuple2.f0) 
<= 0);
    --- End diff --
    
    Right, will fix it.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Reply via email to