[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17273052#comment-17273052
 ] 

Kezhu Wang commented on FLINK-21132:
------------------------------------

I did not find an easy/viable way to distinguish truly end of input from 
stop-with-savepoint style end of input. They are both {{EndOfPartitionEvent}} 
in network. Legacy sources could also emit elements between synchronous 
savepoint and {{EndOfPartitionEvent}}.
{quote}that is when the source and all the predecessor operators have shut down.
{quote}
How this could be viable for, say, a no chained head operator ? AFAIK, no 
chained operator has only two inputs from outside: rpc call through 
{{TaskExecutorGateway}} and stream elements and events from predecessor 
operators through input channel. I saw only {{EndOfPartitionEvent}} related.

I think stop-with-savepoint has enough room to operate on *all tasks* not just 
*source tasks* without interfering with data flow upon 
{{StreamTask.notifyCheckpointComplete}}. I could give an simple(probably not 
ideal) solution, let {{Task}} query {{AbstractInvokable}} to know whether it 
should *finish* partition writers after successful run. This way FLINK-21133 is 
solved also.

> BoundedOneInput.endInput is called when taking synchronous savepoint
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-21132
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21132
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Runtime / Task
>    Affects Versions: 1.10.2, 1.10.3, 1.11.3, 1.12.1
>            Reporter: Kezhu Wang
>            Priority: Major
>
> [~elkhand](?) reported on project iceberg that {{BoundedOneInput.endInput}} 
> was 
> [called|https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/2033#issuecomment-765864038] 
> when [stopping job with 
> savepoint|https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/2033#issuecomment-765557995].
> I think it is a bug of Flink and was introduced in FLINK-14230. The 
> [changes|https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/9854/files#diff-0c5fe245445b932fa83fdaf5c4802dbe671b73e8d76f39058c6eaaaffd9639faL577]
>  rely on {{StreamTask.afterInvoke}} and {{OperatorChain.closeOperators}} will 
> only be invoked after *end of input*. But that is not true long before after 
> [FLIP-34: Terminate/Suspend Job with 
> Savepoint|https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=103090212].
>  Task could enter state called 
> [*finished*|https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/3a8e06cd16480eacbbf0c10f36b8c79a6f741814/flink-streaming-java/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/streaming/runtime/tasks/StreamTask.java#L467]
>  after synchronous savepoint, that is an expected job suspension and stopping.
> [~sunhaibotb] [~pnowojski] [~roman_khachatryan] Could you help confirm this ?
> For full context, see 
> [apache/iceberg#2033|https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/2033]. I have 
> pushed branch 
> [synchronous-savepoint-conflict-with-bounded-end-input-case|https://github.com/kezhuw/flink/commits/synchronous-savepoint-conflict-with-bounded-end-input-case]
>  in my repository. Test case 
> {{SavepointITCase.testStopSavepointWithBoundedInput}} failed due to 
> {{BoundedOneInput.endInput}} called.
> I am also aware of [FLIP-147: Support Checkpoints After Tasks 
> Finished|https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/mw-ZCQ], maybe the three 
> should align on what *finished* means exactly. [~kkl0u] [~chesnay] 
> [~gaoyunhaii]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to